Former Friend of the Court employee suing supervisor, Bay County for sexual harassment

By Cole Waterman | Cole_Waterman@mlive.com

BAY CITY, MI

— A former employee of the Bay County Friend of the Court has filed a lawsuit against Bay County and her former supervisor, alleging years of sexual harassment.

Patricia McIver on Thursday filed a suit in Bay County Circuit Court, alleging that while she was employed with the Friend of the Court she was persistently harassed by supervisor Dennis Bergevin.

According to the suit, McIver worked as a youth development counselor at the Bay County Juvenile Home from October 1993 until March 1997, at which point she started working as a court clerk for former Circuit Judge Lawrence Bielawski. In 2002, she started working for the Friend of the Court as a financial technician and then a child support modification specialist.

Starting in 2005, McIver worked directly with Bergevin, the suit states.

During her employment, McIver “was subjected to a hostile working environment and quid pro quo requests for sexual favors, and other verbal and physical conduct by Defendant Bergevin in communications of a sexual nature,” a portion of the suit reads.

Bergevin made lewd comments, touched McIver and took photos of her with his cellphone, the suit claims.

McIver on multiple occasions addressed her concerns with Elizabeth Roszatycki, head of the Friend of the Court, and alleges her complaints were brushed aside.

Martha P. Fitzhugh, Bay County’s attorney, said the suit is too new to comment on a potential defense.

“At this point, the county will turn over the case to our insurance organization, which is the Michigan Municipal Risk Management Authority, and they will provide a defense for the defendants,” she said. “It will involve some investigation as to the facts, and that’s going to take some time. We were aware that there were some issues pending, but at this point we’re going to review them further and then move forward.”

The Bay City Times was unable to reach Bergevin or Roszatycki for comment.

Bay County has a nondiscrimination policy, wherein employees who believe they are being discriminated against are to “report the alleged discriminatory conduct to the division head or department head.” Roszatycki was to notify the human resource director of McIver’s concerns, but the suit indicates this protocol was not followed, and Roszatycki attempted to excuse or justify Bergevin’s behavior.

Claiming she was unable to take the harassment any longer, McIver stopped working at the courthouse in December 2010, requesting sick leave. Bay County denied granting McIver the sick pay, something her attorney, Saginaw-based Victor Mastromarco Jr., says amounts to retaliation.

At the county’s direction, McIver met with a psychiatrist, who said he had no reason to doubt McIver’s claims, the suit indicates. The county still refused to provide McIver with sick leave.

McIver resigned in May 2011.

Mastromarco alleges his client is suffering from “emotional distress, mental anguish, embarrassment, humiliation, fear, shock, intimidation, breach of trust, anxiety, depression, nervousness, disruption of lifestyle and denial of social pleasures and enjoyment,” as well as economic hardships. Mastromarco claims Bay County violated the state’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employers from discriminating against staff based on religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, familial status or marital status.

Mastromarco said the suit alleges McIver is owed at least $25,000, the minimum amount for the suit to be filed in circuit court.

“The jury gets to decide, based on the damages we present, how much to award,” he said.

Mastromarco added there is a possibility for the case to wind up in federal court.

“We’ve also filed a complaint with the (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), and they have not acted yet. They’re in the process of investigating. You have to file with them before you can file in federal court.”

The suit has been assigned to Bay County Circuit Judge Harry P. Gill. No court dates have yet been scheduled.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/bay-city/2012/03/former_friend_of_the_court_emp.html

Age discrimination lawsuit filed against Saginaw police by former recruit

By Gus Burns | fburns@mlive.com

SAGINAW — Joseph J. Dervisi, 38, of Midland is suing the city of Saginaw, claiming the Saginaw Police Department discriminated against him because of his age.

Saginaw Police Chief Gerald H. Cliff and Sgt. Anjanette”A.J.” Tuer visited Dervisi at the the Delta College Police Academy on the day of his final exam and terminated him on Dec. 11, 2009.

Victor J. Mastromarco Jr. who is representing Dervisi, filed the $25,000-plus lawsuit on Jan. 24, 2011 in Saginaw County Circuit Court.

Sponsored by the Saginaw Police Department, the complaint says Dervisi started the 17-week police academy on Aug. 24, 2009.

Dervisi, who served in the U.S. Air Force from 1992 to 1996, was the “oldest recruit at the academy” and told that he would be “held to a higher standard because of his age and experience,” the lawsuit says.

The city’s response says Dervisi disrupted academy classes and displayed a “lack of effort or inability to properly conduct himself,” even after “repeatedly” being counseled.

Academy logs show either staff or Saginaw police employees counseled Dervisi about his “negative attitude” four times prior to his termination.

There is no court date set for the next hearing in this case.

Dervisis claims his rights under Michigan Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act were violated.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/2012/02/age_discrimination_lawsuit_fil.html

Saginaw City Council at odds regarding $75,000 settlement of lawsuit filed against Parishioners on Patrol co-founder

By Gus Burns | fburns@mlive.com

SAGINAW — Saginaw taxpayers or the city’s insurer will shoulder the cost of settlement in the dispute between a prominent Saginaw pastor and the former site coordinator for the city’s Weed and Seed crime prevention program.

Saginaw City

Council on Monday agreed 5-4

to pay Ronald O’Brien, the former Saginaw East Side Weed and Seed site coordinator, $75,000

to settle a lawsuit

O’Brien filed against the Rev. Larry Camel, the co-founder of Parishioners on Patrol for defamation.

Saginaw, the “fiscal agent” of the federal grant, “indemnified” or assumed liability on Camel’s behalf related to the case.

Camel, who sat on the Weed and Seed steering committee with Saginaw Councilman Amos O’Neal, also a co-founder of Parishioners on Patrol, requested $10,000 be paid to the nonprofit for mobilization work, court documents filed by Saginaw attorney Victor J. Mastromarco Jr. on behalf of O’Brien show.

The Saginaw Weed and Seed “steering committee” hired O’Brien, 63, of Frankenlust Township for $40,000 for a year to act as site coordinator beginning in January 2009.

The dispute

Mastromarco’s filing says Weed and Seed moved into a unit of the Sedona Building, 310 S. Washington in downtown Saginaw, which housed a computer lab, four offices and a reception area.

“It was understood that Parishioners on Patrol would supply volunteers to monitor a computer lab inside the Weed and Seed offices,” Mastromarco’s filing says. “Over the next several months, Rev. Camel had various disagreements with” O’Brien, “which typically involved a financial detriment to… Camel.”

The court filing claims Camel solicited O’Brien for contributions to his church — Camel is a pastor at New Birth Missionary Baptist Church at 1418 S. Warren in Saginaw — and often used office space to promote or sell church-related fundraiser items, such as tickets for a “taco sale” and “fruit,” which O’Brien said violated grant guidelines.

The lawsuit accused Camel of disparaging O’Brien by “maliciously and without any factual evidence” accusing O’Brien of “hating children and being a racist.”

When O’Brien’s contract expired in January of 2010, Camel made an “unplanned motion” at the steering committee meeting to allow O’Brien’s contract to expire without renewal, O’Brien’s lawsuit alleges.

The complaint says the action violated meeting bylaws and O’Brien’s contract would have been renewed had committee members sympathetic to O’Brien known about the vote and been at the meeting.

The defense, represented by Jamie C. Hecht Nisidis of Saginaw Township’s Braun Kendrick law firm, filed a response denying O’Brien’s claims and stating “no duly enacted bylaws” existed.

Computer question

Mastromarco’s court filing says, “another point of contention was two laptop

computers purchased with grant money… The day the computers arrived, Camel took possession of two.”

“Rev. Camel took one for himself and stated that (Councilman) O’Neal wanted the other one,” the filing says. “Mr. O’Neal entered (O’Brien’s) office and asked, ‘Where’s my laptop?’ and said he needed it for Parishioners on Patrol” duties.

Subsequent remarks in Mastromarco’s court filing indicate Camel returned one computer and do not include what happened to the other.

O’Neal said he never requested or possessed a computer related to the Weed and Seed Program.

Diane Hobbs, the Weed and Seed coordinator when the grant ended, said the program purchased two laptop computers prior to her arrival, which remain in the possession of the computer lab.

Mastromarco, Camel, O’Brien and O’Neal said they could not comment about the case. Mastromarco said there is a confidentiality clause as part of the settlement agreement with Saginaw officials.

‘Cheap way out’

Council members Norman Braddock, Larry Coulouris, Andrew Wendt and Annie Boensch voted against the agreement, while Mayor Greg Branch, Mayor Pro Tem Dennis Browning, and Council members Amos O’Neal, Floyd Kloc and Dan Fitzpatrick voted in favor of the settlement.

“For me, it had everything to do with being a new councilman, going into closed session and having the facts as they were presented to me,” Braddock said. “Afterward, I did some of my own investigation… and this  is something we should have aggressively pursued, and there is no doubt in my mind… that we would have prevailed.”

Braddock said “municipalities tend to take the cheap way out,” but Saginaw “has had a reputation over the years for being an easy target for people that want to sue.”

“That has got to end because that is taxpayers’ money we’re giving away,” he said.

Braddock said City Council agreed to give City Manager Darnell Earley approval to negotiate a settlement up to a designated amount after a previous closed-session meeting.

Circuit Court notations to the case that are available on the Saginaw County website show the “case settled” on Dec. 29. Subsequent notes from the same date say: “need j’mt or other closing order.”

Wendt also voted against the settlement.

“My No. 1 reason why I voted (no) is I don’t believe the city should have represented Rev. Camel,” Wendt said. “I don’t think we should have represented him, and I don’t think we had any legal obligation to do so.”

Kloc, who voted in favor of settling, said the city had agreed to assume liability and indemnify Camel prior to him becoming aware of the settlement negotiations.

“I voted for it because I thought it was in the city’s best interest under the circumstances,” said Kloc, who is an attorney. “Had I been involved in it earlier, I might not have felt the same.”

The program

Weed and Seed is “a program that focuses on community-driven crime prevention and improvement of residents’ lives in high-crime neighborhoods. It is a two-part strategy,” the program’s website says. “ To ‘seed’ neighborhoods with prevention, intervention, treatment and revitalization services” and to ‘weed out’ violent offenders via intensive law enforcement and prosecution efforts.”

Among the activities in Saginaw, half of the Weed and Seed funds were spent on a computer lab and community initiatives.

The Saginaw Police Department spent the remainder on police initiatives.

The Weed and Seed program received grants for $175,000 in 2008, $142,000 in 2009 and $157,000 in 2010, said Sheila Jerusalem, a spokeswoman for the Department of Justice.

She said Saginaw’s most recent Weed and Seed grant expired Sept. 30. The U.S. Department of Justice Community Capacity Development Office, which administered funds for Weed and Seed, closed in June due to lack of funding.

Jerusalem said financial status reports submitted by Saginaw show the program spent $173,747.52 of the 2008; $114,236.18 of the 2009; and $64,340 of the 2010 grant to date.

Hobbs said all of the grant funds have been spent and final spending reports were submitted.

Using computers, printers, a copy machine and other equipment purchased with Weed and Seed grant funds, the computer lab continues to operate under a nonprofit named the Center for Community Solutions, said Sharon McKeethen, the program’s site coordinator.

“We’re still doing training here at the computer lab and working with our neighborhood groups,” she said. “Until someone tells us what they want to do with (the computers and equipment), we’ll continue to run the lab here.”

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/2012/01/saginaw_city_councilman_amos_o.html

Retired Tuscola County judge named in sexual harassment suit

By LaNia Coleman | The Bay City Times

CARO — A former Tuscola County Probate judge is at the center of a sexual harassment suit.

Retired judge W. Wallace Kent Jr., Tuscola County and the Probate Court are named as defendants in the suit filed Nov. 1 on behalf of Kerri Zelmer, a former Probate register.

Zelmer, represented by Saginaw attorneys Victor Mastromarco and Manda L. Danieleski, resigned Oct. 1, 2010, under threat of termination after it was revealed that she had a sexual relationship with Kent, according to court documents.

Kent, 70, ended his 34-year judicial career Dec. 31.

Zelmer alleges Kent demanded sexual favors.

Court records do not indicate what Zelmer received in exchange.

The liaisons began in June 2010 and ended in September 2010 when Kent’s wife discovered the relationship, court records indicate.

Kent then revealed the relationship to Probate Court employees and to colleagues at a judicial conference, Kelmer alleges.

The judge then posed the ultimatum that Kelmer resign or be fired, records suggest.

Kelmer, who is seeking an unspecified sum in excess of $75,000, claims violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment, as well as the state Civil Rights Act.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/bay-city/2011/11/retired_tuscola_county_judge_n.html

Former judge faces sexual harassment lawsuit

By Mary Drier

It wasn’t a trick and it certainly wasn’t a treat when Tuscola County Commissioners were informed Oct. 31 of a lawsuit against the county by a former employee pertaining to an alleged romantic affair with a former county judge.
During a closed session at that meeting, Michigan Municipal Risk Management Authority attorney Laura Amtsbuerhler informed commissioners a lawsuit was going to be filed.
On Nov. 4, Attorney Victor Mastromarco, Saginaw, filed a lawsuit in United States District Court – Eastern District of Michigan in Bay City on behalf of former employee Kerri Zelmer against the county, former Tuscola County Probate Judge W. Wallace Kent, Jr., and Tuscola County Probate Court.
Zelmer started working for the county May 25, 1995, as the probate register to Kent’s court. She resigned on Oct. 1, 2010.
Through this lawsuit, Zelmer and her attorney are requesting a trial and seeking at least $75,000 compensation.
Count one of the federal case charges: violations of the equal protection act. The charge claims Kent, “intentionally, arbitrarily, and irrationally discriminated against (Zelmer) by requiring her to submit to the sexual relationship with Judge Kent and when she refused to divorce her husband and discontinued the affair, she was forced to resign under threat of termination.”
The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment protects citizens from irrational and arbitrary governmental behavior and also prohibits discrimination based on gender.

Count two charges: sexual harassment in violation of the Title VII and the Michigan Elliot Larson Civil Rights Act.
The suit claims Kent asserted sexual harassment quid pro quo, and sexual harassment based on hostile work environment, that his sexual advances were “unwelcome;” as Zelmer’s supervisor had authority over her. Also, that Zelmer’s “acceptance or rejection of the conduct of Judge Kent was an express implied condition of her continued employment.”
Part of the Elliot Larson Civil Rights Act of 1976 that the suit refers to: prohibits discriminatory practices, policies, and customs in the exercise of those rights based upon religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, familial status, or marital status.
The details of the lawsuit contend that: on June 25, 2010, Kent asked Zelmer to come to his home “under the pretenses of returning the county credit card during the afternoon hours.” During that visit “Kent attempted to extract a quid pro quo sexual relationship (with Zelmer) which culminated in a sexual relationship, and various demands for sexual favors and sexual acts.” Also, that “Kent insisted on a sexual relationship and made repeated promises that the relationship would not affect (her) job.”
The following is a timeline in court records: on Sept. 12, 2010, Kent told Zelmer his wife discovered the relationship.
On Sept. 14, 2010, Kent told her he was going to make an announcement to court staff on their sexual relationship, and did that on Sept. 15, 2010.
Then, Sept. 16-17, 2010, Kent announced the relationship to several at a judicial conference he attended.
On Sept. 17, 2010, Kent told Zelmer the Probate Court Administrator she would have to step down from her position.
On Sept. 19, 2010, Kent told Zelmer “she had to either ‘resign or be fired.’”
The court record said that Zelmer “was subjected to quid pro quo requests for sexual favors, and other verbal and physical conduct” by Kent, or “communications of a sexual nature, whereby submission to the conduct or communication was made a term or condition either explicitly or implicitly for continued employment. Also, that she was subjected to a “hostile environment and harassment.”
Tuscola County officials declined to comment on this pending litigation and said the county has not been formally given a copy of the lawsuit as of Tuesday.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

Judge rules against village of Birch Run, former chief’s award could be $883,970, attorney says

By Tom Gilchrist | The Saginaw News

BIRCH RUN — The lawyer for ex-Birch Run Police Chief Robert J. Mowatt Jr. estimates Mowatt will receive close to $900,000 — including interest — after a Saginaw County judge ruled in favor of him and his claims that he was fired without just cause in 2006.

Saginaw County Circuit Judge Robert L. Kaczmarek on Aug. 5 denied the village’s motion to invalidate or change an arbitrator’s decision awarding Mowatt $460,249 plus a pension benefit that Mowatt’s lawyer, Saginaw attorney Victor J. Mastromarco Jr., claims is $257,858.

Kaczmarek ordered attorneys for Mowatt and the village back in front of arbitrator Karen Smith Kienbaum — who made the initial award to Mowatt — to determine the amount of the pension benefit.

When interest is added, Mastromarco calculates the total award to Mowatt will amount to $883,970, assuming Mastromarco is correct about the pension amount.

“The interest owed on the judgment will kick it up quite a bit,” Mastromarco said. “It’s compounded on the last five years since (Mowatt’s) lawsuit was filed in 2006.”

Mastromarco declined to say what percentage of the judgment he’ll receive in attorney fees.

The Saginaw News could not reach Birch Run village Manager Paul T. Moore or Birch Run’s attorney, Commerce Township lawyer Paul E. Pedersen for comment.

Mowatt, 60, works as a part-time officer for the Frankenmuth Police Department and is retired from the state police.

Kienbaum granted Mowatt wages and benefits he would have received to 2016, when he turns 65. Kienbaum issued her award in August of 2010 but Birch Run village officials appealed to Kaczmarek.

Kienbaum’s opinion stated Village Council members considered Mowatt insubordinate for failing to sign a “performance improvement plan” village officials gave to him Dec. 5, 2005.

The arbitrator found the absence of such a signature didn’t amount to just cause for his dismissal. Mastromarco said the plan indicated Mowatt was “deficient in all these different areas,” but that Mowatt disagreed with the village’s assessment and refused to sign the it.

Mowatt was hired in 1998 as a lieutenant for the Birch Run Police Department, according to court records. The village promoted him to chief in 1999.

Kienbaum wrote in her opinion that problems arose between Mowatt and village leaders in 2003, when a former village manager supported Mowatt’s decision to discipline an officer.

The village fired the manager, and Moore, then a Village Council member, was hired as manager, according to the opinion. Mowatt’s lawsuit alleges Moore, as village manager, harassed Mowatt.

Though the village claims Kienbaum exceeded her authority in failing to find just cause for Mowatt’s firing, the village doesn’t “cite any authority which establishes that Mowatt’s actions constitute insubordination,” Kaczmarek wrote.

The village argues Kienbaum improperly disregarded an agreement with the village, signed by Mowatt in 2005, requiring him to file a request for arbitration within six months of his Jan. 23, 2006 dismissal.

The village maintains Mowatt didn’t file such a request within the six-month period, but Kaczmarek wrote that the village and Mowatt agreed to arbitration at a Nov. 6, 2006, court hearing. Such an agreement, when made in open court, is considering binding, according to the judge.

If the village doesn’t further appeal Kaczmarek’s ruling, it isn’t immediately clear how much of the award will be paid by the village.

Mastromarco said some municipalities “have a large deductible, like the city of Saginaw has, that requires the city to pay the deductible out of the city’s own pocket, and once that’s done, the insurance policy kicks in.”

The village’s insurance premiums will rise as a result of the award given Mowatt, Mastromarco said.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/2011/09/judge_rules_against_village_of.html

Attorney: Demoted lieutenant awarded $200,000 judgment in lawsuit against sheriff, Saginaw County

By Barrie Barber | The Saginaw News

SAGINAW — A veteran Saginaw County Sheriff’s Department road patrol sergeant has won $200,000 from his lawsuit against Sheriff William L. Federspiel and the county alleging he was demoted out of “political spite,” court records and an attorney said.

Sgt. Mark G. Garabelli, 48, of Thomas Township claimed Federspiel demoted him from lieutenant to his old rank of road patrol sergeant because he had campaigned for Federspiel’s rival, then-Sheriff Charles L. Brown, in the August 2008 Democratic primary. Federspiel defeated Brown, then a 10-year sheriff, and went on to win the November general election.

In September 2008, as a “lame duck sheriff” in the weeks after he lost to Federspiel, Brown promoted Garabelli from sergeant to lieutenant, court records state.

Federspiel removed Garabelli from the lieutenant’s post within weeks of taking office. He made Robert X. Karl, his campaign manager, his undersheriff. When Federspiel demoted Garabelli, he promoted Robert B. Phelps, whom the suit states had been a rumored candidate for undersheriff, to lieutenant from sergeant.

A case evaluation panel of three attorneys mediating the lawsuit recommended the judgment. Both sides accepted by Friday’s deadline, said Victor J. Mastromarco, Garabelli’s Saginaw attorney.

David A. Wallace, a Saginaw Township lawyer who represented the county, and County Controller and Chief Administrative Officer Marc A. McGill declined comment.

Federspiel said in court records he demoted Garabelli as part of restructuring. The Saginaw News could not reach him for further comment.

Karl said Garabelli’s removal wasn’t tied to political allegiance.

“That is absolutely false,” he said, declining further comment.

In his deposition, Garabelli called the restructuring “a sham” and said Phelps’ promotion was “no doubt in my mind a payoff for him.”

“It is undisputed that Phelps was an avid supporter of Federspiel,” Mastromarco said in court documents. “In fact, after the election and at a party at Woody O’Briens (a local bar), Sheriff Federspiel called Phelps up on stage and congratulated him for his efforts with respect to the election.”

Federspiel said in his deposition he didn’t know if Phelps supported him and he had told Phelps he would not be his choice for undersheriff. While Federspiel said Phelps was “disappointed,” Phelps told attorneys he didn’t want the undersheriff’s job because it would hurt his retirement pay and benefits to leave a union contract position to become an at-will employee. He said he had no relationship with Federspiel before Brown’s primary defeat.

Karl said in his deposition that Phelps appeared on stage on Election Night in November 2008 to show solidarity for Federspiel’s choice for him as undersheriff.

Garabelli sought more than $25,000 for lost wages and benefits and anguish, among other claims.

The case was set for a March jury trial before Bay County Circuit Judge Joseph K. Sheeran. Saginaw County judges disqualified themselves from the case.

First Amendment rights

Garabelli claimed Federspiel violated the state Constitution and his First Amendment rights to political free speech with the demotion.

Federspiel denied politics caused Garabelli to lose the higher-paying post or played a role in Phelps’ promotion.

The sheriff said in a deposition Garabelli was removed four months into his six-month probationary period. He said Phelps was promoted as part of a reorganization of the department and a campaign pledge to bring change, the deposition shows.

Attorneys representing the county argued that as sheriff, Federspiel had “absolute immunity” from the suit. They further contended Garabelli “had admitted the sheriff’s right to restructure his department” during a deposition, court records said.

Phelps became leader of the Administrative/Technical Services Division, which in part oversees the Area Records Management System, a Jan. 23, 2009 Sheriff’s Department memo shows. Phelps was a sergeant who oversaw the records system before his promotion, according to court records.

Federspiel reassigned Lt. Paula Lounsbury from the Law Enforcement Division to Garabelli’s former job because of Lounsbury’s year of command experience, court documents said. “I needed a fresh face at the jail and Lt. Lounsbury had command experience,” Federspiel said at his deposition.

Neither Federspiel nor Karl formally reviewed Garabelli’s performance before his demotion, Mastromarco said in court records.

Federspiel breached a labor contract because a lieutenant can only be removed for “performance-based demotion and voluntary resignation,” court records contended. However, the county referred to the same contract clause to justify Garabelli’s removal.

The demotion cost Garabelli lost wages “as well as a more favorable pension plan and a loss of a county car, along with the prestige of the position and opportunities for future advancement,” Mastromarco wrote in court filings.

The top base wage for a sergeant is $58,685 while a lieutenant’s top salary is $64,147, according to county figures.

Former Undersheriff Arnold Burns described Garabelli as “a hard charger” who was “very professional” and “very dedicated,” court documents show. Capt. William Gutzwiller called Garabelli’s promotion “absolutely correct” and his performance “outstanding,” documents indicated.

Lounsbury and Gutzwiller recommended Phelps’ promotion when Federspiel assumed office, court records said. The plaintiffs contend Phelps had never applied before nor tested for a lieutenant’s position prior to his promotion.

Garabelli testified in a court deposition that he put up campaign signs for Brown and cooked food at a campaign fundraiser during the Frankenmuth Democrat’s unsuccessful re-election bid.

Court records stated Phelps told Garabelli before his demotion to take it “in stride” because Federspiel had other plans for him, Garabelli told attorneys.

In his deposition testimony, Phelps said he spoke to Garabelli shortly after his promotion and tol

d him “that I thought he was a pawn in a dangerous political game being propagated by the current Sheriff Brown.”

Phelps acknowledged he didn’t back Brown in the election.

“Brown’s guiding principle was cronyism. Promoting people he thought, he kept repeating this theme, that were personally loyal to him,” Phelps said in his deposition.

Phelps added there was “no operational necessity to fill the job except I’m big on personal loyalty. And I also heard him state in my presence, Brown, that these people are going to come in and tear down everything I do, everything I’ve built, that’s what it was. And so he’s trying to leave people he thought were loyal to him in perpetuity or whatever to carry on his philosophies. And the voters were obviously ready for a change from his philosophies. I just thought Mark was being thrown into an unfair trap based on all kinds of dynamics that could happen.”

Phelps told attorneys he had witnessed a department reorganization under former Sheriff Tom McIntyre, now director of Saginaw County Central Dispatch also.

Brown said politics did not play a role Garabelli’s promotion.

“The answer is I promoted the best people who I felt possible in the position,” Brown stated in his deposition. “It had nothing to do with politics.”

In an interview with The Saginaw News, Brown denied Phelps’ claims.

“Bob is notoriously blatant in his opinions, and not too many of them are very much substantiated,” Brown said. “No one was ever promoted because of loyalty; they were promoted because of their ability to do the job. That’s why they were promoted.”

Brown said he wanted to leave the department in the “best hands possible” as he and Burns, his undersheriff, worked with Federspiel and Karl during the transition.

“My interest is or was that I work for the people of Saginaw County,” said Brown, now a member of the state Parole Board. “It has nothing to do with politics. … It had nothing to do with Charlie Brown. It had to do with what’s best for the community.”

The Saginaw News could not reach Phelps for comment.

Garabelli told attorneys he met with Federspiel shortly after the new sheriff assumed office and assured him of his loyalty to his new boss. Garabelli, court records said, was demoted two weeks later.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/2011/02/sergeant_wins_200000_judgment.html

Jury awards $750,000 to former Saginaw officer for ‘mental anguish,’ lawyer says

By Tom Gilchrist | The Saginaw News

BAY CITY — Attorneys for former Saginaw Police Department officer Patrick C. Shaltry said a U.S. District Court jury awarded $750,000 to Shaltry on Friday for “mental anguish” he suffered due to discrimination against him by the department.

Saginaw lawyer Victor J. Mastromarco Jr. said the jury returned the verdict late Friday afternoon. Jurors “found the city retaliated against (Shaltry) for reporting what he believed was sexual harassment by his supervisor,” Mastromarco said.

Shaltry, 42, of Tittabawassee Township, alleges his supervisor, Sgt. Anjanette “A.J.” Tuer — head of internal affairs — sexually harassed him and “commenced a campaign of retaliation” leading to his dismissal.

John A. Decker and E. Louis Ognisanti, two of three Saginaw Township attorneys representing the city of Saginaw, could not be reached for comment by The News.

According to court documents, the jury didn’t find that Tuer sexually harassed Shaltry. Jurors, however, ruled the city unlawfully fired Shaltry in retaliation for alleging sexual harassment by Tuer.

The jury awarded the $750,000 as damages for “embarassment, humiliation, mental and emotional distress and anguish (Shaltry) experienced as a consequence” of his alleged discrimination against him, according to court documents.

Shaltry, who joined the department in 1996, claims he was wrongfully fired in 2008. His lawsuit claims he “rebuffed” Tuer’s sexual advances and she subjected him to “pervasive harassment and retaliation.”

The lawsuit named Tuer; Ralph Carter, the city’s labor relations administrator; Thomas H. Fancher, the city attorney; and Police Chief Gerald H. Cliff. All four individuals were dismissed as defendants prior to the trial before U.S. District Judge Thomas L. Ludington.

The jury began deliberations on Thursday afternoon.

In court documents, Tuer denies making any sexual advances toward Shaltry, and city and police officials deny that Shaltry reported any claim of sexual harassment.

Shaltry was fired for “numerous violations of the terms and conditions of his employment,” according to court documents filed on the city’s behalf.

His lawsuit sought back pay, lost future pay, bonuses, sick pay, vacation pay, and fringe benefits, though the jury’s award wasn’t for any of those reasons, but for “non-economic” damages, according to Mastromarco.

“On top of the verdict, the judge will be able to assess attorney fees, which will be added to the jury’s award,” Mastromarco said.

Mastromarco said the cost for attorney fees “will be substantial” but noted he hasn’t calculated that cost yet.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/2011/02/jury_awards_750000_to_former_s.html

Black worker sues Heart of West Michigan United Way for discrimination

By John Agar | jagar@mlive.com

UPDATE: Worker says United Way retaliated against her for complaining about workplace discrimination

GRAND RAPIDS – A Heart of West Michigan United Way worker says she was denied advancement in the agency because she is black.

Benita Jasper alleged in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court that the agency retaliated against her after she complained about race discrimination. She contended that a “pattern of discrimination” cost her a higher-paying job that went to a white man hired into the agency.

A former worker, Dana Lovelady-Hoyt, who is white, also is suing because she said she suffered retaliation after she supported Jasper’s claims.

Attorney Victor Mastromarco Jr., representing both women, said the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission found that Lovelady-Hoyt “had been subjected to a racially hostile environment and that she was disciplined and constructively discharged in retaliation for her complaints of discrimination.”

In the suit, he said the EEOC proposed the United Way pay Jasper $91,000 in back pay, $250,000 in punitive damages and pay all non-management black workers a total of $800,000.

But Bert Bleke, interim president, said the EEOC has since backed off that proposal, and has closed the case.

“We’re disappointed it has come to this, and we do really feel strongly that it has no merit, and that will be borne out,” Bleke said.

“Our position is, there really is no merit in either of the lawsuit.”

Bleke said no organization is perfect, but “I have seen no inkling of discrimination based on race, color or creed and so on.”

According to a 2008 report, seven minority workers at United Way attended a meeting with outside counselors, who determined that the workers had lost trust in United Way leadership, and were not hopeful that the agency would become more racially and ethnically diverse, the lawsuit said.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/2010/12/heart_of_west_michigan_united.html

Local dealership under fire by former employee claiming age discrimination

By: STACY LANGLEY

BAY CITY — A Bad Axe man has filed a wrongful termination suit against a local car dealership.

According to court records from U.S. District Court in Bay City, Patrick Gottschalk, 60, of Bad Axe, alleges the dealership, George Ordus Ford-Mercury in Bad Axe, violated state and federal age discrimination laws.

As a result of Gottschalk’s termination on Jan. 20, 2009 from the dealership, Gottschalk is seeking that the court award him more than $75,000 in damages to fully compensate him for all of his economic and non-economic damages that were a result of the dealership’s “wrongful actions,” court documents state.

Gottschalk was hired by the dealership in 1976 and worked as the dealership’s service manager from 1977 until he was dismissed.

Court documents also show Gottschalk alleges his job performance was satisfactory, and that in an April advertisement mailed to customers by the dealership, he was listed as the service manager after he had been terminated. Gottschalk claims he did not give the dealership permission to use his name in the ads.

Gottschalk is represented by Saginaw attorney Victor J. Mastromarco Jr.

Ordus Ford is being represented by attorney Suzanne P. Bartos of the law firm Plunkett and Cooney. Bartos could not be reached for comment.

To Read The Original Article Go To:

https://www.ourmidland.com/news/article/Local-dealership-under-fire-by-former-employee-7300469.php